Sports Save 3D TV?
Washington, D.C. (June 5, 2011)
-- From Wall Street
there's a growing call for the studios to dramatically reduce
the number of 3D movies. Industry officials are pointing out
that 3D box office revenues are continuing to fall with many
consumers opting to attend the film's less expensive 2D version.
believe there's a little too much 3D right now. I think,
especially in this economy, parents don't always want to spend
that extra money," Lauren Donner, producer of X-Men: First
recently told an industry conference.
Since the remarkable success of the 3D Avatar in late
2009, the studios have bet that moviegoers would pay a premium
for 3D films. (The 3D edition is priced anywhere from 20-45
percent more than the 2D version.) But movies from Pirates
of the Caribbean 4 to Kung Fu Panda 2 are generating
less than 50 percent of their overall revenue from the 3D
versions; a year ago, 3D films were taking in 60 percent or more
from the 3D editions.
The disappointing numbers are being felt hard by the studios and
3D-related companies. For instance, Dream Works' stock fell
about 10 percent shortly after it released the 3D Kung Fu
Panda 2 while 3D production company RealD saw its stock fall
You might say that the quick solution would be for the studios
to lower the price of 3D films. But surveys indicate that
Americans may be losing interest in 3D movies as a category
regardless of the price due to the need to wear 3D glasses
during the film, among other reasons.
The studios are planning to roll out more 3D films this summer
and fall, including the third installment in the Transformers
series. But if the results don't dramatically improve, it's not
hard to envision a scenario in which the studios soon start
limiting 3D films to animated children's films. And if they
don't do well, it's possible that a majority of studios will
decide to get out of 3D entirely by 2012.
Would people buy 3D
TVs just to watch sports?
That would be a major blow for 3D TV makers who have bravely
maintained that disappointing 3D TV sales will improve once more
3D movies are released on Blu-ray. If Hollywood begins to dry up
the 3D movie pipeline, the only reason to buy a 3D TV would be
to watch sports in 3D.
But is that enough?
Even 3D doubters, including yours truly, acknowledge that
watching a game in 3D can occasionally be thrilling. The extra
dimension can enhance your viewing experience in a way that's
difficult to describe but easy to feel.
However, the special nature of watching sports in 3D is usually
fleeting; there might be a moment every 30 minutes or so when
you go, "Wow, that player looked like he was going to jump in my
living room." But that can get old -- and so can wearing those
3D glasses during a three-hour sporting event. Even 3D TV makers
caution that you should take the glasses off every 15 minutes or
so to avoid headaches and other physical ailments.
So the answer to the question at the top of this article is
probably no. Sports alone can not save 3D TV.
Consequently, 3D TV makers better hope that 3D movies do better
-- much better -- in the second half of 2011. If they don't, the
3D TV "revolution" could be over before it really got started.
Amazon's HDTV Store!
to see today's Swanni Sez.
Phillip Swann is president and publisher of TVPredictions.com.
He has been quoted in dozens of publications and broadcast
outlets, including CNN, Fox News, Inside Edition, The New York
Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Financial
Times, The Associated Press and The Hollywood Reporter. He can
be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
Click TVPredictions.com to read
more news and features on TV technology.
|Swanni Sez has 10,000+