Home
Reader Forum
HD Heaven
New:
 Swanni TV
About
Contact
Advertising
Product Reviews
Press Release
Service
Subscribe
Hire Swanni
 


 

 
News
Supreme Court Ruling Could Boost HDTV Prices
The court says manufacturers can stop sellers from offering large discounts on suggested prices.
By Phillip Swann
 
Washington, D.C. (June 28, 2007) -- The Supreme Court today ruled that manufacturers and retailers can agree on minimum prices for products.

The 5-4 decision means that a TV maker could require a High-Definition TV to be sold at a set price, thereby denying a discount store or online retailer to offer a lower price to boost sales and customer traffic.

The ruling could have a dramatic impact on how high-def sets are marketed in the future, particularly during the competitive holiday season. And it could mean that HDTV prices will be higher than anticipated in the coming months.

Last year, discount stores and ecommerce sites triggered a HDTV price war by offering some large-screen Plasma and LCD sets for under $1,000 -- well under the TV makers' suggested retail prices. The discounting led to reduced profits for both TV makers and big-box CE retailers such as Circuit City.

However, under today's court ruling, it would appear that retailers could not offer those discounts without the permission of the manufacturer. The Associated Press reports that the court ruled that minimum price agreements are legal if they further competition in the marketplace.

The court decision overturned a 96-year-old law against "minimum pricing" agreements. But Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in his majority opinion that a minimum pricing agreement could promote competition, the AP reports.

Justice Stephen Breyer disagreed.

"The only safe predictions to make about today's decision are that it will likely raise the price of goods at retail," Breyer wrote in dissent, according to the AP.

The decision was based on a case in California where a leather company had entered into an agreement with select retailers to maintain certain prices for its goods. The two parties wanted to ensure that the chosen retailers could effectively compete with discount stores which might offer lower prices for the leather products.

According to the AP, Kennedy's majority opinion was shared by Justices John Roberts, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia. Dissenting with Breyer were Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

____________________________________________

____________________________________________

Click TVPredictions.com to see today's Swanni Sez.

© TVPredictions.com
____________________________________________

Phillip Swann is president and publisher of TVPredictions.com. He has been quoted in dozens of publications and broadcast outlets, including CNN, Fox News, Inside Edition, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Financial Times, The Associated Press and The Hollywood Reporter. He can be reached at swann@tvpredictions.com or at 703-505-3064.


Click TVPredictions.com to read more news and features on TV technology. 

 
 
 
Daily E-Mail Newsletter!

Sign Up for Swanni Sez!
Delivered to your e-mail box.

* Email Address:   
Swanni Sez has 10,000+ subscribers!
 
Search TV Predictions


TVPredictions.com

Hundreds of articles on HDTV!

Advertisement


_______________________________________

More HDTV Links:
Universal HD to Air 'Live Earth' In HD
What Internet TV Needs to Succeed
Samsung: The LCD HDTV Leader
MHD to Carry Diana Concert In HD
Comcast: Dish Owners Prefer Our HD
Best Buy Offers Free Blu-ray Spiderman
Starz to Launch 3 HD Channels