|
|

Commentary
DIRECTV Doesn't Care About HD Anymore
By Swanni
Washington, D.C. (July 12, 2011)
--
Two years ago, I
predicted
that DIRECTV would dramatically slow down its rollout of
High-Definition channels. At that time, the satcaster was
considered the leader in HD programming, offering more than 100
HD channels.
But I predicted that DIRECTV
would decide
it would no longer pay extra fees to basic cable channels to
carry their high-def channels; I added that DIRECTV would
conclude that the extra HD channels would not result in
additional subscribers so why spend the dough?
Two years later, my prediction has clearly come true. DIRECTV
has added about 30 HD channels over the last two years, but most
of them have been HBO and Cinemax channels which the
satcaster committed to carrying back in
2007.
DIRECTV clearly does not want to pay basic cable channels such
as AMC, BBC America, E!, National Geographic Wild (and many
others) to carry their HD editions. Consequently, DIRECTV does
not carry these HD channels while most of their rivals do.
When I made my prediction two years ago, I was attacked
viciously in e-mails and on Internet message boards by DIRECTV
apologists who said the satcaster would continue to rollout
basic cable channels as well as premium channels in high-def.
They said DIRECTV would have 200 HD channels by now, as the
satcaster alluded to in a series of misleading commercials it
ran about its '200 HD Channel Capacity.'
Well, if the apologists still believe that, they need to read
the following paragraphs in a Multichannel News article that was
published yesterday. Here's what Multichannel News wrote:
"For
DirecTV, the HD “bigger is better” battle is over. “To be
honest, I think right now, everyone’s got most of the important
stuff in HD,” Derek Chang, DirecTV executive vice president of
content strategy and development, said. “Once we got to 100
channels, it became about delivering the overall experience.”
There’s less benefit in trying to hit 200 HDs because those by
their nature will be less-watched networks, he noted. DirecTV is
going to continue to add channels “selectively as we see fit and
where we can deliver value to the customer,” Chang said. The
satellite operator is advancing along several new fronts,
including 1080p HD (Blu-ray Disc quality), early-premiere
movies, sports, iPad apps, multiroom viewing and enhancing the
guide.
“HD is just one piece of the puzzle,” Chang said.
Folks, can it be more obvious? DIRECTV no
longer thinks that adding HD channels is an important factor in
attracting and keeping subscribers. In 2007 and 2008, the
satcaster used its high-def expansion to built its subscriber
totals. But now, the company believes that adding HD channels is
too costly; it makes more sense to launch such programs as
multiroom viewing and $30 Video on Demand movies.
In short, DIRECTV doesn't really care about HD anymore.
So if you're a HDTV owner who does care about HD -- who doesn't
think you have gotten "most of the important stuff in HD" -- you
have a choice to make. If you stay with DIRECTV, it's highly
unlikely you'll ever get channels such as AMC and BBC America in
HD, at least not for some time. But if you leave DIRECTV, your
next TV provider may already carry them.
It's your choice.
Final Note: Here's why I wrote in December 2009 in my
2010 Predictions story:
DIRECTV Will Offer
Less Than 200 HD Channels
The satcaster has just launched a new satellite that will double
its capacity to offer high-def channels. DIRECTV, which now
claims it offers 130 HD channels (including PPV), says it will
have the capacity to provide 200 HD channels.
But I predict that DIRECTV will fall far short of the 200 HD
channel count in 2010, even when you factor in PPV channels. I
also predict that DIRECTV will only add about 10-15 high-def
cable networks next year.
Why?
DIRECTV has to pay the programmers extra money to carry their
high-def signals, something that it's loathe to do in a stagnant
economy. (This is why DIRECTV has been battling with the Versus
sports channel for the last three months; it doesn't want to pay
Versus more money to carry its SD and HD signals.)
So instead of adding real channels, DIRECTV will keep costs down
-- and appearances up -- by adding more PPV HD channels and
other services such as 3-D HD broadcasts.
The satcaster will try to fool the public into believing that
it's offering a lot more HD when actually it will largely just
inflate its HD channel count with more PPV.
Shop Now!
Amazon's HDTV Store!
Click TVPredictions.com
to see today's Swanni Sez.
© TVPredictions.com ______________________________________________________
Phillip Swann is president and publisher of TVPredictions.com.
He has been quoted in dozens of publications and broadcast
outlets, including CNN, Fox News, Inside Edition, The New York
Times, The Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Financial
Times, The Associated Press and The Hollywood Reporter. He can
be reached at swann@tvpredictions.com
or
at 703-505-3064.
Click TVPredictions.com to read
more news and features on TV technology.
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Swanni Sez has 10,000+
subscribers!
________________________________
__________________________________
|
| Search TV
Predictions |
|
|
|