|
|
HDTV Review Swanni's HDTV
Grammys! Today's top music stars may sound good, but how do
they look in crystal-clear high-def? By Phillip Swann
Washington, D.C. (February 13,
2006) -- The music industry convened
in Los Angeles last week to hand out the 2006 Grammy Awards for the
best musical performances of the year.
But, of course, at
TVPredictions.com, we don't evaluate celebrities on how they
sound, but rather how they look in ultra-real High-Definition TV.
The HD picture, which is up to six times clearer than regular TV,
allows viewers to see the stars as they look in real
life.
So, here are Swanni's HDTV Grammy Awards -- the Best
& Worst Looking Musicians of 2006, when seen through the
unforgiving lens of high-def:
Worse
in HDTV Madonna Madonna reportedly has had some cosmetic surgery on her face.
But it certainly didn't make her a cut above the rest. The pop
star's cheeks look more caved in than a West Virginia coal mine.
It's very unnatural looking. In fact, she's starting to look like
Gloria Swanson in Sunset Boulevard. Except, please, no
close-ups, Mr. DeMille.
Better in
HDTV
 Beyonce Knowles The Pink Panther star
is the cat's meow in high-def. . Beautiful skin; beautiful teeth;
beautiful hair. And, yes, a beautiful body. Of course, it helps that
Beyonce is 24 years old, but youth alone won't save you from the
high-def lens. (See below.)
Read:
Swanni's 'Laughing at the Stars!'
Who knew that celebrities could be that stupid?
Worse
in HDTV Britney Spears Yes, Mrs. Federline is 24, but she looks 34 in HDTV. Her
skin is puffy and covered with small blemishes. In high-def, she
looks like a different person. And considering the
disappointing sales of her last two albums, her record company might
think she's become a different person.
Better in HDTV
 Christina Aguilera The singer has nice skin and beautiful
white teeth. But it's her sparkling blue eyes that really shine in
high-def. Very pretty. If Madonna ever has to reprise her MTV
kiss, she would be wise to skip Britney and go straight for
Christina.
Better in HDTV Mariah
Carey She's a
little chunky, but she looks downright luscious in high-def.
Her skin is clear and smooth and seems to glisten in HDTV. At last
week's Grammy Awards, Mariah wore a dress cut so low that it would
make a baby cry. However, despite the excess pounds, she pulled it
off. Well, she didn't really pull it off or the FCC would have
smacked CBS with another 'wardrobe malfunction' fine.
Worse in HDTV Alicia
Keys Ms. Keys
is very cute, but her longtime acne problem is very visible in
high-def, particularly around her cheeks. She has endorsed the acne
cream, Pro-Activ, but it doesn't look like it's working very
well.
Better in
HDTV Sting The former Police front man is 54, but he could pass for 44
in high-def (maybe even younger). His face is largely unlined and
there's very little excess skin around the eyes. Sting practices
Yoga; so forgive the pun, but it's no stretch to see the
benefits.
Better in HDTV Paul
McCartney Surprised? Well, I was when I saw him in high-def during
the Grammy Awards. Thanks to some hair dye (and who knows what
else), the 63-year-old looks considerably younger than his years. I
guess we'll still love him when he's 64.
Worse in HDTV
 Mick Jagger In high-def, his face looks like a rolling stone.
No, on second thought, it looks like it's been hit by a
rolling stone.
© TVPredictions.com
Phillip Swann is
president and publisher of TVPredictions.com. He has been quoted in
dozens of publications and broadcast outlets, including CNN, Fox
News, Inside Edition, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The
Chicago Tribune, The Financial Times, The Associated Press and The
Hollywood Reporter. He can be reached at swann@tvpredictions.com
or at 703-505-3064.
And
click TVPredictions.com to read more news and features on TV
technology.
| |
|